Fluid Dynamics: Video Game Industry and Weather Modification

Solar Geoengineering. In which Novim, a private climate “research” corporation, and MIT, have shown us pictures of and labeled it solar geoengineering, and Novim called it Shortwave Climate Engineering, and then what we “chemtards” call chemtrails. Geoengineering being a misnomer, as is “nanotechnology” is to Ultra-precision Machining— solar geoengineering, by aircraft, is weather modification by chemtrails, deployed in intricate numerical weather models. These numerical climate models represent entire cloud processes in the atmosphere, ranging from micro- to nano- scales. These models can also represent aerosols while representing fluid, that of which the atmosphere contains both particles and water (and gases).

Navier-Stokes equations computationally explain the movement of fluid, combined with Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), they both are used in weather modification to model atmospheric fluid. Meanwhile, there is a growing industry, the Gaming market. Video games are increasingly becoming more robust in their designing; showcasing physics and fluidic movements. Weather in video games is becoming more realistic. Such games as Grand Theft Auto Five, display an advanced weather generating engine, even being gracious enough to include chemtrails/aerosol precursors.

Here are some examples of fluid dynamics between the video gaming industry and cloud seeding/weather modification/geoengineering:

Video game use

Practical Fluid Dynamics: Part 2

“Following up his popular recent article, Neversoft co-founder Mick West explains the technical details – including source code – of creating dynamic fluid systems such as smoke for video games.”


Navier–Stokes equations use in games

“The Navier–Stokes equations are used extensively in video games in order to model a wide variety of natural phenomena. Simulations of small-scale gaseous fluids, such as fire and smoke are often based on the seminal paper “Real-Time Fluid Dynamics for Games” by Jos Stam, which elaborates one of the methods proposed in Stam’s earlier, more famous paper “Stable Fluids” from 1999. Stam proposes stable fluid simulation using a Navier–Stokes solution method from 1968, coupled with an unconditionally stable semi-Lagrangian advection scheme, as first proposed in 1992.”


Fluid dynamics in cloud seeding/weather modification/geoengineering

10.6. Computational Fluid Dynamics models 
These models are tightly connected to numerical weather prognostic (NWP) … The flexibility of CFD models’ application for different purposes led to their large … Either the modification of an NWP model to perform microscale simulations, or an …

Microphysical Effects of Wintertime Cloud Seeding with … 
ABSTRACT A series of winter orographic cloud seeding experiments is …. flow distortion on oceanographic platforms using computational fluid dynamics.

Cloud Brightening – Oxford Geoengineering Programme … 
University of Oxford
Results 1 – 10 of 22 – … (v) computational fluid dynamics studies of possible large-scale … Can a reduction of solar irradiance counteract CO2-induced climate change? ….. It does not have many of the drawbacks that stratospheric injection of..

Here are parties abroad also employing CFD (using google alone to keep this post short):

Department of Energy Fluid Dynamics:

nsf.gov – Funding – Fluid Dynamics – US National Science …
National Science Foundation
Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems. Fluid Dynamics. CONTACTS. Name, Email, Phone, Room. Dimitrios …

NASA Fluid Dynamics:

DARPA Fluid Dynamics:

The use of Computational Fluid Dynamics in the Nanotechnology industry

Nano Fluid Dynamics:

To be clear here, I personally, am not saying video game developers are flying through the skies making chemtrails. However, some former developers are now part of DoD teams. Some former game developers own chemtrail debunking websites. Some former developers are administers on conspiracy theory debunking forums. The relation of gaming engines to climate modeling imaging in weather modification, is a motive for former developers sympathetic to Federal agencies, to have websites about debunking chemtrails obstensibly.



Introduction to Federal Nanoscience: Smoke and Mirrors

Hello concerned reader.

This topic is an introduction to the United States National Nanotechnology Initiative, while also raising questions about Nanotechnology’s history.

To start with, let us have a look at the NNI’s goals that it wishes to achieve.

NNI Vision, Goals, and Objectives

“The vision of the National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) is a future in which the ability to understand and control matter at the nanoscale leads to a revolution in technology and industry that benefits society.

The NNI expedites the discovery, development, and deployment of nanoscale science, engineering, and technology to serve the public good through a program of coordinated research and development aligned with the missions of the participating agencies. In order to realize the NNI vision, the NNI agencies are working collectively toward four primary goals; please note that each of the following goals is linked to a page detailing each goal’s objectives:

  1. Advance a world-class nanotechnology research and development program;
  2. Foster the transfer of new technologies into products for commercial and public benefit;
  3. Develop and sustain educational resources, a skilled workforce, and a dynamic infrastructure and toolset to advance nanotechnology; and
  4. Support responsible development of nanotechnology.

    “The list of Federal partners is quite extensive, ranging from NASA, the DoD, to the Agricultural Research Service.Most of us familiar with researching Nanotechnology know the basic gist, manipulating and controlling atoms and molecules.  However, Nanotechnology itself is a misnomer. It originally got its start as Ultra-precision Machining. Here is an excerpt from the NNI:

    in his explorations of ultraprecision machining, Professor Norio Taniguchi coined the term nanotechnology

    Materials that are designed in the nano scale by ultraprecision machining, henceforth, Nanotechnology.  Where the misnomer truly fits in (and my questions start to arise), is when these meta materials are no longer made in the nanoscale, but smaller, like Pico scale or Femto scale. Electron microscopes allow one to see in the nanoscale, as well as beyond the nanometer.

    Here is another excerpt from the NNI about seeing in the nanoscale:

    Beginning as early at the 1930s, scientists were able to see at the nanoscale using instruments such as the scanning electron microscope, the transmission electron microscope, and the field ion microscope.

    Upon reading that, just how much has been produced using Nanoscience since the Thirties? Possibilities could be ranging from synthetic fibers to the powders used in the pharmaceutical industry.

    Another interesting excerpt:

    It wasn’t until 1981, with the development of the scanning tunneling microscope that could “see” individual atoms, that modern nanotechnology began.

    See the discrepancy? Scientists were able to see in the nano scale in the 1930’s, but not until 1981.

    Let’s take another look at the name “Nanotechnology” and its definition, the manipulation and control of atoms.  The size of atoms and most molecules are not nano sized, but Angstrom sized (10−10 m), smaller than nanoscale (10-9 m).

    What was just said? Atoms. When was the Atom Bomb invented, in 1933 with the first successful test in 1945. What is the size of an atom again? Angstrom. In order for the scientists to see the atoms (isotopes) they were working on, they would need the very same microscopes used to see in the nanoscale and smaller.

    This shroud has extended into “modern Nanotechnology”. The FDA, EPA, and CDC claim not to have the mechanisms to detect nanomaterials in the environment. But what are the mechanisms mentioned? High powered microscopes. They will state in published research that nanomaterial ill-effects are not well understood, but then proceed to describe in full detail, the effects of engineered nanomaterials on biological systems.

    Now we do a 360 back to the goals of the NNI. From foods, beverages, to cosmetic products. Because there are no regulations, commercial companies involved with Nanotechnology research and development are left to their own recognizance to report any negative effects of their designer nanomaterials.

    Monsanto and RAND Corporation once said that Agent Orange was harmless. Ask a Vietnam veteran that has come into contact with Agent Orange how they feel about that statement.


Unregulated Rogue Nanotechnologies

Hello, my name is Pete Ramon, I am a Nanotechnology activist living in Michigan, USA.

I first became interested in Nanotechnology soon after first seeing chemtrails in 2009, when going down a road and looking up and seeing the local sky being fully gridded out. I had never seen anything like it. I spent a great deal of my life looking down, being a skateboarder for over twenty years, as I was decent at it.  Looking up that day changed my life.

I had heard of HAARP a long time ago, but my interest had peaked after seeing the sky in it’s condition that day. I checked out these books from my local library and read “Angel’s Don’t Play This HAARP” first, then “The Fantastic Inventions of Nikola Tesla” right after. I got on facebook to see what kind of activism there was against HAARP, and was surprised at how many groups there was, ranging from HAARP technology to Chemtrails. I joined the group, “Occupy HAARP”, which is were my activism started.

Through my first year of activism, I kept coming across “Smart Dust” technologies (e.g. MEMS/NEMS sensors). Then the field just continued expanding into other fields of Nano Tech, such as carbon nanotubes, nanofibers and biological and metallic nanoparticles. Since about sometime in 2011′, I primarily research Nanotechnology and its derivatives there-in. This technology has no oversight. No real governance or regulations.

By definition, Nanotechnology is the manipulation and control atoms and molecules at the nano scale, and was first discussed by Richard Feynman in 1959. Nanotechnology, though, is a misnomer, its actual name started out as Ultra-precision Machining. It was coined “Nanotechnology” by a Japanese scientist in 1974 in a semiconductor conference, then later used by Nanotechnology pioneer Eric Drexler in his first paper in 1981. With this said, though, scientists have been able to see in the nano scale since the 1930’s. There is a shroud over Nanotechnology, as modern Nanotechnology wasn’t to have gotten its start until 1981 with the advent of the scanning tunneling microscope. But how else could scientists see in the nano scale in the Thirties without an STM? There are a number of high-powered microscopes that can see in the nano scale, in which the first prototype electron microscope was constructed in 1931, by German physicist Ernst Ruska and electrical engineer Max Knoll. Two years later in 1933, a stronger electron microscope is constructed by Ruska. We now advance more than 50 years into the science to the present, now called Nanoscience. Now including Nanobiotechnology, BioNanotechnology, or Nanobiology, the combination of biological research integrated with various fields of nanotechnology.

 In the past few years, I have discovered that FSC cigarettes contain EVA (ethylene-vinyl acetate) nanoparticles. E-Cigarettes contain metallic nanoparticles. Then I started noticing more and more people complaining of intestinal problems, young people even.  It made me push into Nanotechnology being applied to food stuffs and beverages. It was a bit of a surprise to find out that the FDA approves the use of a photocatalytic Titanium Dioxide nanoparticle. This particle is known to degrade biological matter, as was once intended to be used on the Deep Water Horizon oil spill. Food grade Nano TiO2 has now been linked to Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

Nanotechnology also provides the means to meet Mother Nature on her on ground, at her own game. Charged organometallic nanoparticles have the ability to act as cloud condensation nuclei.

As this is just a scale of measurement, as the technology can get much, much smaller. Particulate matter is the name of the game.

The world of Nanotechnology is so vast, it’s a great opportunity to write here on Climate Viewer News about the very real dangers of Nanotechnology, and be able to go into detail in each field.

Thank you, Jim Lee.